This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Prevent implicit FPU usage

From: Momchil Velikov <velco at fadata dot bg>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:37:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Prevent implicit FPU usage
References: <43B88EBB.2050209@fadata.bg> <43B9B8E2.5010103@fadata.bg>

Momchil Velikov wrote:
> Tests are in progress, will post them later ...

[The subject lines are wrong :( ]

pristine: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00117.html

sh-sim/-m4/-mhitachi
  # of unexpected failures	142
sh-sim/-m4
  # of unexpected failures	12

patched:  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00118.html

sh-sim/-m4/-mhitachi
  # of unexpected failures	142
sh-sim/-m4/-fno-implicit-fp
  # of unexpected failures	14

The two extra failures in ``-fno-implicit-fp'' test are also present in
``-mhitachi'' runs, thus I'd rather think they come from the usage of the
Renesas ABI.

~velco

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Prevent implicit FPU usage
  - From: Paul Brook

References:
- [PATCH][RFC] Prevent implicit FPU usage
  - From: Momchil Velikov
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Prevent implicit FPU usage
  - From: Momchil Velikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]