This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, fortran] PR25029 unbounded assumed size array references
- From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Cc: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:30:40 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] PR25029 unbounded assumed size array references
- References: <43B62E5E.4060401@wanadoo.fr> <20060102010405.GA7545@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:08:14AM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote:
>
>>It responds in the same way as ifort and DF5.0, so I think that all is
>>well. However, that is what I thought before, so I would be grateful if
>>Toon and Steve would put the patch through through its paces.
>>
>
>
> I've bootstrapped and regression tested this patch on i386-*-freebsd.
> My private testsuite, which includes LAPACK that revealed the problem
> with the original patch, also passed.
>
> I think the patch is ready for committing, but give Tobi a chance
> to respond. Oh, please check your white space. Some of the
> patch seemed misaligned in my mailer.
I won't have time before wednesday, I haven't looked at the patch in depth
yet, but one case I'm worried about is calling LBOUND(a) where a is an assumed
size array inside an argument list.
- Tobi