This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re:[testsuite] [patch] array alignment fix - part 2/3

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
To: Dorit Naishlos <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:08:34 -0800
Subject: Re:[testsuite] [patch] array alignment fix - part 2/3
References: <OFA669B971.35A3419E-ONC225705F.0052BA41-C2257061.0046BECC@il.ibm.com>

Hi Dorit,

Changelog:
        * gcc.dg/vect/pr16105.c: Replace "aligned types" with regular
types.
        No longer vectorizable on vect_no_align targets.
        * gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-74.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-75.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-76.c: Likewise.

* gcc.dg/vect/vect-37.c: Replace "aligned types" with regular types. Will not be vectorizable on vect_no_align targets once aliasing issues are resolved. * gcc.dg/vect/vect-79.c: Likewise.

        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-77.c: Replace "aligned types" with regular
types.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-78.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-97.c: Likewise.

Is this patch still needed? If so, it's OK.

:REVIEWMAIL:

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re:[testsuite] [patch] array alignment fix - part 2/3
  - From: Dorit Naishlos

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]