This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] convert.c: Fix PR tree-optimization/25125.


kazu@codesourcery.com (Kazu Hirata)  wrote on 19.12.05 in <200512192242.jBJMgKJ6006698@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com>:

> Consider
>
> unsigned short
> f (short a)
> {
>   short b;
>
>   if (a > 0)
>     return 0;
>   b = ((int) a) + - (int) 32768;
>   return b;
> }
>
> Here is a sequent of events that are relevant to the bug.
>
> 1. convert.c:convert_to_integer changes the type of the addition in
>    "b = ...;" from signed int to signed short.  That is, we now have
>    b = a + -32768, where '+' is done in signed short.
>
> 2. Since the result of overflow is undefined for signed operations, VRP
>    assumes that b is in range [-INF, -32768], which is really -32768.
>    Note that the return type is unsigned short, so
>    "(unsigned short) -32768" comes out to be 32768.  In short, for all
>    a <= 0, this function returns 32768, which is wrong.

Hmm.

For a = 0, that seems to be the correct result.
For a = -1, the original wants to do b = -32769, which seems undefined,  
and thus the result is correct. Similarly for even more negative a.

Where is the actual bug here?

MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]