This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: off-by-one in get_ident


Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

| On Dec 13, 2005, at 3:28 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
| 
| > Andrew, when you write messages like this, do you honestly believe you
| > are adding any value to the development process?  Please don't.  It's
| > not your opinion of C++ that matters here but the consensus of the
| > developers, and we already came to a consensus the LAST time this was
| > discussed.
| 
| Actually there was no consensus IIRC.  The discussion just died.

the coding conventions was not changed last time you asked and you
were pointed to the coding conventions.

| Nothing
| came up from it.  In fact codingconventions.html does not mention this
| case
| at all. 

The coding convention says:

  Avoid the use of identifiers or idioms that would prevent code
  compiling with a C++ compiler. 


it goes on enumerating most the obvious cases, but the general
principle is to avoid idioms that would prevent code compiling with a
C++ compiler.  That was the case in the issue I raised in my original
email. 

[...]

| For one I don't like casts.

Me neither.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]