This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] make it safe to include basic-block.h and tree-flow.h from C++

> Changing the name is the more correct fix.
> as it will keep the code in line with the other code around it.

Ok. Should I change the name instead of the declaration in array.h too?

Bootstraped on GNU/Linux/x86
Rafael

gcc/ChangeLog:
              tree-flow.h: (edge_prediction): rename edge to e
              predict.c:  rename edfe to e in edge_prediction
              varray.h: (varray_data_tag): use struct rtx_def * instead of rtx
                                                            use struct
rtvec_def * instead of rtvec
                                                            use union
tree_node * instead of tree

Attachment: gcc-cpp.patch
Description: Binary data

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]