Re: [PATCH] fold -> foldN

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

Roger Sayle wrote:

> Patches to transition from "build" -> "buildN" have been pre-approved
> by Mark, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00061.html
> But the transition was put on hold, during stage2 and stage3.  Whilst
> I agree with Mark, Steven and you about the possible minor inconvenience
> to branch merges, unless we're slightly more aggressive about these
> clean-ups, they may end up lingering indefinately.  The actual changes
> themselves are mechanical, and I've received more complaints that this
> wasn't finished for gcc 4.1 than thanks that it made anyone's life any
> easier :)

I think maybe those of us constant doing branch merges need to be more
thankful. :-)

> Mark, would you agree with the above sentiment.  Is your previous
> global pre-approval still good?

Yes, we definitely want to see this project move forward, and stage 1 is
the perfect time for it.  And, yes my pre-approval is still good.  I'm
not sure if I agree about doing this stuff in Stage 3, but I do think
doing it in Stage 2 is reasonable as well.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304