This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A few more test case cleanups for -fPIC and SCO
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Kean Johnston wrote:
> >This is IMHO the wrong way to do it. Instead the
> >{ dg-require-effective-target tls }
> >or
> >{ dg-require-effective-target tls-runtime }
> I concur. However, since I didn't find such a beast, I made the
> surgical changes. I'm quite happy to leave those bits out till
> the effective tls/tls-runtime bit are commited, and then adjust
> for SCO accordingly.
It seems much cleaner to backport the tls effective target support
to 4.1 and 4.0 and use that. Both of those branches also support
selector-expressions in target and xfail lists; see the docs for
test directives in the internals manual; it looks as if there are
places where they would make things simpler as well.
> If the patch will not be applied to the 4.0 branch can I check
> in the more "surgical" changes as included here? Or should I
> also backport the tls/tls-runtime effective target patch to
> 4.0-branch once its been committed to head/4.1?
I'd prefer to see the effective targets backported to 4.0.
Janis