Re: [patch] adjust ltcf-c.sh for darwin

[Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>]

On Nov 18, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> I see the diff below, but I do not think it's due to this patch.  
> Right?

A test without your patch will tell you that.  :-(

> Can others confirm they see the same failures in gcc?

> -# of expected passes           38299
> -# of unexpected failures       12
> -# of expected failures         93
> +# of expected passes           38300
> +# of unexpected failures       27
> +# of expected failures         94
>  # of untested testcases                28
>  # of unsupported tests         380

I got:

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            38193
# of unexpected failures        11
# of expected failures          93
# of unresolved testcases       21
# of untested testcases         28
# of unsupported tests          380
/Volumes/mrs3/net/gcc-darwinO2/gcc/xgcc  version 4.1.0 20051111  
(experimental)

:-(