This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran] Fix gfortran include problem
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 05:49:30PM +0100, Fran?ois-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> >> What happens in the presence of symlinks? Does
> >> this patch (correctly?) follow the a symlink?
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean. Could you give an example along with
> > the behaviour you expect?
>
> Sorry, I should have added that the patch doesn't make any difference
> between a symlink and a regular file in the same directory as the
> symlink. That is, as far as I tested, the behaviour of this patch wrt
> symlinks is exactly the same as g77.
>
If it replicates g77 behavior, then it should be fine.
I'll go over the patch later today for review if no one
beats me to it.
What I'm thinking about is a case where file.f is a
symlink to tmp/fileA.f. In tmp/ we have fileB.f such
that fileA.f has "include fileB.f". Will gfortran
find fileB.f?
ls -l .
file.f -> tmp/fileA.f
ls -l tmp
tmp/fileA.f
tmp/fileB.f
--
Steve