This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24518 and PR24520 - Improvements to MOD and
- From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- To: Timothy C Prince <tprince at myrealbox dot com>
- Cc: tprince at computer dot org, jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi,tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:19:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24518 and PR24520 - Improvements to MOD and
- References: <1131915389.c7dca09ctprince@myrealbox.com>
Tim,
Itanium linux results showed no significant difference between in-lined and library results, except for a large gain at all loop lengths for in-lining the sparse dot product.
Is that for real(8) or real(16)? Can you explain the lack of a difference?
Paul