This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gomp] walk_tree and OMP_CLAUSE_* (take 2)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:32:26 -0800
Subject: Re: [gomp] walk_tree and OMP_CLAUSE_* (take 2)
References: <20051105203612.GR16034@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051105231048.GC15266@redhat.com> <20051108111914.GZ16034@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:19:14AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Is the switch.patch ok for gomp or should I work on an alternate solution?

Yes, it's ok.  Thanks for the measurement.


r~

References:
- [gomp] walk_tree and OMP_CLAUSE_*
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [gomp] walk_tree and OMP_CLAUSE_*
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [gomp] walk_tree and OMP_CLAUSE_* (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]