This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tag reorg

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:02:13 -0500
Subject: Re: Tag reorg
References: <1130640885.8960.37.camel@linux.site> <m3y84bwq2f.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510301135220.19187@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> along with any other mistaken tags (and branches).
> 
> I think merge tags for active branches should be the responsibility of the 
> branch maintainers to do as they wish with.  Merge tags and branchpoint 
> tags from branches that have been completely merged into mainline can 
> probably go, subject to lists of those it's proposed to remove being 
> posted in advance for consideration.  (A few tags such as those marking 
> mainline before and after tree-ssa was merged in should stay around.)

Okay, well, consider this an official proposal to remove:

1. the tree-ssa branch *merge* tags (IE the ones used to merge trunk
into tree-ssa, *not* the other way around
2. the ast-optimizer-branch merge tags
3. structure-aliasing-branch merge tags.
4. tree-cleanup-branch merge tags
5. tree-profiling-branch merge tags

(I'm much more concerned about cleaning up merge tags than branches, we
have 1588 things in the flat tags dir left :P)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tag reorg
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Tag reorg
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Tag reorg
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Tag reorg
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Tag reorg
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]