This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] ARM pre-indexing adress mode for absolute addresses
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Nicolas Pitre <nico at cam dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:52:52 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM pre-indexing adress mode for absolute addresses
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508301542500.15345@localhost.localdomain> <4315441E.7040301@codesourcery.com> <4320DBE9.2010201@mvista.com> <200509090240.41068.paul@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0509090103400.17004@localhost.localdomain> <1126257301.18092.46.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510191316500.5288@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 18:19, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> > I think you've just uncovered a latent bug, but you should be using
> >
> > plus_constant (base_reg, index)
> >
> > rather than gen_rtx_PLUS.
>
> Although the regression is now fixed, is it still worth making that
> change?
Yes, but there's an embargo on non-regression fixes at present.
R.