Re: [gomp] New tests

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:44:14PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 12:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> > By any chance, do you have the Fortran testcases as well?
> >
> Not yet.  I should have them ready before EOD.

Thanks.

> > So, IMHO either we should translate it into GOMP_flush function call and
> > do the __sync_synchronize (); in libgomp, or use something equally
> > strong to a non-pure function call to prevent optimizations across it.
> >
> Yeah, that'd be the easiest approach.  OMP's memory model asks for 
> consistency at flush and lock points (1.4.2 and 3.3).  Annoyingly, no such 
> text seems to exist for barrier.

Not true:

2.7.5 says:
A flush region without a list is implied at the following locations:
* During a barrier region.
...

	Jakub