This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fix 23714

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:20:33 -0700
Subject: Re: fix 23714
References: <200510121232.j9CCW6Jk002155@53v30g16.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <434F61BD.3080308@codesourcery.com> <20051014235513.GA20831@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:43:57AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
>>I suggested an alternative method, which would be to notice in the back
>>end when we try to generate the address of a register in this way, and
>>simply return zero at that point; we know that executing that code must
>>be undefined memory.
> 
> 
> Something like this?

Yes, exactly.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- Re: fix 23714
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: fix 23714
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: fix 23714
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]