This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Kean Johnston <jkj at sco dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>,Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:44:30 -0400
Subject: Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
References: <43501381.7070101@sco.com> <3099424a3fa19c262c7bc1af9a6ee316@physics.uc.edu> <435020D8.20502@sco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510142320520.5934@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <43503F63.3030804@sco.com>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:29:39PM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote:
> Then the fix to define MAXPATHLEN if not previously defined
> is both easier and more portable. Otherwise, I would have
> to change code to dynamically create an array rather than
> using a stack based local, and that code would have to use
> some much-more-likely-to-be-non-portable mechanism for
> determining the real maximum path length for the specific
> filesystem.

No, the point of dynamic allocation is to not impose any "real maximum
path length" - some systems don't have one.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
  - From: Kean Johnston

References:
- SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
  - From: Kean Johnston
- Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
  - From: Kean Johnston
- Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: SCO OpenServer / UnixWare port update
  - From: Kean Johnston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]