This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gomp] thread-safe libgfortran (fixes PR fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:11:42 -0700
- Subject: Re: [gomp] thread-safe libgfortran (fixes PR fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
- References: <20051006235329.GG8983@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051007201737.GA2635@twiddle.net> <20051008004755.GD22818@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:47:55PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> What's wrong with this? There are different locks.
I mis-read, clearly.
> Ok for gomp?
As far as I'm concered, it's ok now, even if there are further
changes necessary. There's no sense in carrying around a patch
this large...
> @@ -157,33 +130,33 @@ system_clock_8 (GFC_INTEGER_8 *count, GF
> + mx = GFC_INTEGER_4_HUGE;
Paste-o?
r~