Re: [c++/19163] status update

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Hi Benjamin,

> Looking at other alignment issues, and found this bug, which seems to
> be ready to go. However, it's not in.
>
> Maybe just a lack of follow up?
>
> Richard, is this now ok? If not, wassup?
>  
I can add a bit of additional info:

- At the time I understood - also thanks to private exchanges with Mark, 
if I remember correctly - that the real, complete solution required 
quite a bit of work. At the same time, I managed to prepare the 
*minimal* implementation of tr1/aligned_storage that I was looking for 
(basically by following the hint in tr1 itself about unions and avoiding 
typedefs) and personally stopped really pushing small scale fixes for 
the short term.

- Then, at GCC Summit, when I reminded the open issue, Nathan vaguely 
told me that maybe he could work on the long standing issue in the near 
future: maybe he wants to add something... ;)

Ciao,
Paolo.