This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran -fno-automatic and save_all (PR fortran/23677)(take 2)

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:54:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran -fno-automatic and save_all (PR fortran/23677)(take 2)
References: <20050926083644.GT1020@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <4337B819.9080609@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20050926144328.GU1020@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:58:01AM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
>>Your work might be relevant for PR 19425, which is an enhancement request.  As
>>noted in PR 23677 -fno-automatic should really be a synonym for
>>-fmax-stack-var-size=0, that way the duplicate save problem wouldn't occur.
> 
> 
> So you prefer something like this instead?
> If yes, ok for HEAD/4.0?

Yes.  NB the comment in the PR is the result of a discussion with Paul Brook
(on IRC IIRC).

Thanks,
- Tobi

References:
- [PATCH] Fix Fortran -fno-automatic and save_all (PR fortran/23677)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran -fno-automatic and save_all (PR fortran/23677)
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- [PATCH] Fix Fortran -fno-automatic and save_all (PR fortran/23677) (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]