This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] -Wredundant-decls, do not warn for static forward decl

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at crodrigues dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -Wredundant-decls, do not warn for static forward decl
References: <20050828001615.GA3402@crodrigues.org><Pine.LNX.4.61.0508302221010.4521@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20050831051411.GA94358@crodrigues.org>

On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Craig Rodrigues wrote:

> I duplicated the logic for function decls followed by a function definition
> in the same if statement.  I also have an attached testcase.

This test really passes in the form given?  (I'd have expected failures 
because of the "previous declaration" and "previous definition" warnings 
it doesn't check for.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)

References:
- [PATCH] -Wredundant-decls, do not warn for static forward decl
  - From: Craig Rodrigues
- Re: [PATCH] -Wredundant-decls, do not warn for static forward decl
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH] -Wredundant-decls, do not warn for static forward decl
  - From: Craig Rodrigues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]