This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [4.2] Make fold, fold (type) (a CMP b) into a CMP b for integral types

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: patch Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:37:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [4.2] Make fold, fold (type) (a CMP b) into a CMP b for integral types
References: <fad4aa5bab97c2d46fcebc666f740d3b@physics.uc.edu> <9886f6a843cdde057c9bbdb1dc1e973d@physics.uc.edu> <84fc9c0005082901027c72f781@mail.gmail.com>

On Aug 29, 2005, at 4:02 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

On 8/29/05, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> wrote:
On Aug 29, 2005, at 12:23 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
ChangeLog:
      * fold-const.c (fold_unary) <case NOP_EXPR, CONVERT_EXPR>: For
      COMPARISON_CLASS_P and an integral types create create a new
      expression with the new type and fold that.
Oh, blast I attached the older version of this patch which did not
compile
because I had messed up the order of arguments for fold_build2.
Here is the correct one.
Is this really correct?


Yes this has been true since before the EGCS split (aka 1.0 reversion
in the cvs), I did not look at old-gcc to figure out when before that
it was changed.

-- Pinski

References:
- [PATCH] [4.2] Make fold, fold (type) (a CMP b) into a CMP b for integral types
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] [4.2] Make fold, fold (type) (a CMP b) into a CMP b for integral types
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] [4.2] Make fold, fold (type) (a CMP b) into a CMP b for integral types
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]