This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: expanding addrs for initializers

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:55:55 -0700
Subject: Re: expanding addrs for initializers
References: <200508190348.j7J3mQa7007351@greed.delorie.com> <20050819194619.GF11768@redhat.com> <200508232028.j7NKSsMv022973@greed.delorie.com> <20050823223306.GA3199@redhat.com> <200508240244.j7O2iv6g000888@greed.delorie.com>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:44:57PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > So why aren't you getting (symbol_ref:SI "foo")?
> 
> Pmode is HImode.  See other email.

Nevertheless, we see symbol_ref in both SImode and DImode when
doing mixed pointer size stuff on MIPS and s390x.  So pleased
to be investigating why it isn't happening for you.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: expanding addrs for initializers
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]