This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fstack-protector docs

From: James E Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:47:30 -0700
Subject: Re: -fstack-protector docs
References: <1123733206.26252.66.camel@aretha.corp.specifix.com> <F9CD410E-AC4A-403B-B23C-2974E2689D46@apple.com>

Mike Stump wrote:

Hum... Maybe a new category of option, code instrumentation options. We could put all of them mudflap, gcov, -fstack-check, - finstrument-functions, and so on under them.

That is a good idea, but would complicate the patch. I'd prefer that this be handled as a separate issue, as I'm just trying to document someone else's code. If you care enough to create a bug report, I'll care enough to try writing a patch. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com

References:
- -fstack-protector docs
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: -fstack-protector docs
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]