This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: me at cgf dot cx
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:39:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
References: <42F4A108.1050903@gmail.com> <42F85C3F.5040602@lu.unisi.ch> <20050809153745.GB29201@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42FA33D6.8070505@codesourcery.com> <20050810173305.GA29723@nevyn.them.org> <42FA3B92.6040200@codesourcery.com> <20050810175849.GC2155@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>

> Aren't the pex* functions designed to provide a uniform interface
> where "uniform" means "like unix"?

Uniform, yes.  "Like Unix" is a coincidence, not a goal.  Sometimes we
hide a unix-specific feature because we can't mimic it elsewhere (like
simultaneous multithreading) but we prefer to add or wrap
functionality (like #! support).

References:
- [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]