This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Fix PR23230 - wrong code generated in inner class
- From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
- To: Robin Green <greenrd at greenrd dot org>
- Cc: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:19:49 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] Fix PR23230 - wrong code generated in inner class
- References: <20050805152201.GA6662@pob> <42F596DA.6090209@gmail.com> <20050807114318.GA10431@pob>
Robin Green wrote:
Jacks is most likely not the place for such a testcase - AFAICT, they
only check for compilation success, error or warning.
That's not the case. There are runtime tests as well. It is a JLS test not a
test of any specific API, so it should go in Jacks, I think - but I will
double-check on that when I submit it.
Regression tests for gcj PRs should go in libjava/testsuite, so please
include the regression test when you check in your patch. Tests that are
actually in the gcc tree are more likely to get run by "random gcc
hackers", so its good to have as many tests in there as possible.
Of course, if no test for this currently exists in jacks, then it would
be great to put it in there as well.
Bryce