This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PING] Function versioning and IPCP extension


Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote on 27/07/2005 23:08:12:

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:54:52PM +0300, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> 
> > The mangled name is not available at the point we perfom
> > versioning. We create an unmangled name which remains the name
> > of the versioned function, and becomes the final assembly name
> > (it does not get mangled).
> >
> If that's the case, then it's better to just create arbitrary
> function names.  These duplicate functions won't have
> recognizable names anyway, so we can just call them
> 'VERSIONED_FN.xxxxx'  or something.
> 
Yes, I could do that. 
It would be less convenient to track the versioned functions that way, 
because 
they wouldn't have the original prefix...

Razya


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]