This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: LDFLAGS handling in V3

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:56:25 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: LDFLAGS handling in V3
References: <200507272135.j6RLZHH2024117@sethra.codesourcery.com> <20050727215346.GA21277@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

That would be a bug.  LDFLAGS are intended to be compiler driver
options; that's not a new requirement.

OK, great. So, then, the libstdc++ Makefiles should turn them into -Wc, options to libtool, rather than -Wl, as I proposed? That would make clear to libtool that it needs to pass them along to the compiler, rather than silently ignore them. Thoughts?

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: LDFLAGS handling in V3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- PATCH: LDFLAGS handling in V3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: LDFLAGS handling in V3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]