This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [LIBIBERTY PATCH]: fix getopt.c compile failure with cc

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caipclassic dot rutgers dot edu>, dj at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:33:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [LIBIBERTY PATCH]: fix getopt.c compile failure with cc
References: <200507231401.j6NE1oJQ016511@caipclassic.rutgers.edu><m3ll3xk24i.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <200507231517.j6NFHhRL016849@caipclassic.rutgers.edu><m38xzxjz95.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> I think we can probably get rid of that bit of getopt.c, not that it
> really matters.

We can get rid of it most simply by using the glibc or gnulib versions of 
files once taken from glibc (contributing back any still-relevant local 
changes we have first) rather than continuing to maintain our own fork - 
now libiberty can use C90 I don't think there should be any remaining 
obstacles to doing so.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)

References:
- [LIBIBERTY PATCH]: fix getopt.c compile failure with cc
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [LIBIBERTY PATCH]: fix getopt.c compile failure with cc
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [LIBIBERTY PATCH]: fix getopt.c compile failure with cc
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [LIBIBERTY PATCH]: fix getopt.c compile failure with cc
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]