This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch RFC] SH: -fstack-protector support


Kaz Kojima wrote:



It seems a typo in the stack_protect_test documentation.

This pattern, if defined, compares a @code{Pmode} value from the
memory in operand 1 with the memory in operand 0 without leaving the
value in a register afterward and branches to operand 2 if the values
weren't equal.
^^^
The last line should be "were equal", shouldn't it? i386 and ppc
implementations do so.


That is a likely explanation, but till we get clarification from Jacub, we
also have to consider the possibility that it was a bug in the original
implementation that was copied to the ppc port.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]