Re: [patch RFC] SH: Use FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD

[Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>]

Joern RENNECKE <joern.rennecke@st.com> wrote:
> However, I think changing the frame direction is quite a profound change 
> that should
> get build are regression test coverage for a larger part of the SH 
> subtarget spectrum.
> If you can also build and regtest a complete (i.e. multilibbed) sh-elf 
> toolchain without
> regressions, it's OK.
> Regression testing should cover at least one target without fp, and one with
> double precision fp, and one big and one little endian target.  E.g. I 
> commonly use
> the default (SH1 big endian) and "-m4 -ml" (SH4 little endian) to get 
> this coverage.
> If you've already run the gcc/g++/objc regression tests on sh4-linux, we 
> can count this
> towards the floating point and little endian testing.

I'll try it.  Can I assume your patch for PR rtl-optimization/22258
in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00053.html?
Without it, I can't build the mainline for multilibbed sh-elf.

Regards,
	kaz