This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, James E Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Jul 2005 16:53:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions
References: <1120706830.11505.157.camel@aretha.corp.specifix.com> <84fc9c0005070702126ea97583@mail.gmail.com> <1120744525.11872.58.camel@linux.site> <A5878905-5471-40CE-BA40-43C03E6164FA@apple.com>

Although it is true that smaller debug info is better, I think that in
this particular case I would prefer larger debug info.  This
particular case is probably one of the greatest single annoyances when
debugging optimized C++ or vector code.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions
  - From: Theodore Papadopoulo

References:
- [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [patch] better dwarf2 debug info for inlined functions
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]