This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:58:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
References: <200506291537.j5TFbQ031858@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20050629171422.GA21381@redhat.com> <200506292153.j5TLrD030328@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20050629221515.GA23278@redhat.com> <200506292225.j5TMPZ034230@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20050629222851.GA23342@redhat.com> <200506292355.j5TNtR034246@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:55:26PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> 	* expr.c (write_complex_part): Use adjust_address for MEM.
> 	(read_complex_part): Same.

Ok.


r~

References:
- [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]