This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Interprocedural detection of readonly andnon-addressable static variables

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:19:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Interprocedural detection of readonly andnon-addressable static variables
References: <1118241032.8003.10.camel@dyn9002219143> <42A756AF.4040501@naturalbridge.com> <20050628185053.GA18163@topo.toronto.redhat.com>

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 14:50 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
>    something.
> 
> 2. The code predicated with AGRESSIVE_ALIASING has to disappear if
>    we can't still enable it.

Oh, we can, it was just accidently disabled for benchmarking purposes in
the patches that were submitted (remember that Kenny presented numbers
on base vs tree vs rtl vs both?  that was how we generated the tree
numbers :P)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Interprocedural detection of readonly and non-addressable static variables
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [PATCH]: Interprocedural detection of readonly and non-addressablestatic variables
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH]: Interprocedural detection of readonly and non-addressablestatic variables
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: [PATCH]: Interprocedural detection of readonly and non-addressable static variables
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]