This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>,patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:44:17 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90
References: <m33brxys7i.fsf@gromit.moeb> <m3ll5o2i4t.fsf@gromit.moeb> <42A48F49.9050403@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <200506061912.18637.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook wrote:
>>Thus I believe the testcase exposes a pre-existing bug in gfortran.  What
>>should we do?  XFAIL the testcase and open a PR?
> 
> 
> Yes, assuming you can't immediately fix the problem :-)

I've XFAILed the testcase on the mainline and opened PR22038 to track this.

- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]