This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [committed] clarify sleu_operand


On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:49 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com> writes:
> >> Um, this doesn't do the same thing at all.  Please revert.
> >
> > True, but it's more accurate this way.
> 
> No, it's plain wrong.  

> Now read my message again.  You're allowing the constant ~0U, which was
> specifically (and correctly) excluded before.  And you're disallowing
> the upper range of unsigned immediates, even though they work fine.

After writing a long mail about not seeing this I found out that you
were correct in what the instruction would take. It was that we weren't
generating something like:

sltiu $2,$3,-32767

Any ideas why?

I'll revert. Thanks for the catch. My apologies.

-eric


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]