This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch/gfortran] Intrinsic docs

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>,Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:36:10 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch/gfortran] Intrinsic docs
References: <429BFD38.1040603@verizon.net> <429CA79C.2010904@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20050531182350.GA33289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:
>>"... shall be any numeric type"?  I don't think wildcards are appropriate.
>>
> 
> 
> See the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction of the Intrinsic
> Procedure section.  I tried to establish a convention to 
> avoid excessive wordiness.  Perhaps, I failed in my attempt.

I had missed that, thanks for pointing it out.  As long as the docs are
consistent with respect to how this is done, I'm fine with it.

- Tobi

References:
- [Patch/gfortran] Intrinsic docs
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [Patch/gfortran] Intrinsic docs
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [Patch/gfortran] Intrinsic docs
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]