This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: disentangle errors.h vs toplev.h includes

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 25 May 2005 00:08:37 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: disentangle errors.h vs toplev.h includes
References: <200505240406.j4O469321903@caipclassic.rutgers.edu><200505242045.j4OKjVpR003261@greed.delorie.com>

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

| > The implementations of the error functions are completely different.
| 
| Specifically, the ones for the generator file don't need the new OPT_*
| parameter.
| 
| Can we name them differently to preclude future confusions?  Like
| gwarning() for the generator files' warnings?

Yes, that is a good idea.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: disentangle errors.h vs toplev.h includes
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

References:
- [PATCH]: disentangle errors.h vs toplev.h includes
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [PATCH]: disentangle errors.h vs toplev.h includes
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]