This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Allow merging blocks with phi nodes


On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 16:16, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > > New version of fold_stmt (fold_stmt_inplace) is necessary, since
> > > fold_stmt may replace the whole statement, but we cannot get the pointer
> > > to statement from immediate uses, only the statement itself.
> > 
> > Isn't that what bsi_for_stmt () is for?
> 
> bsi_for_stmt is slow at the moment (and fold_stmt does not do much more
> than fold_stmt_inplace does, anyway).
> 

Wasn't Kazu working on a patch to fold the annotations into the
statement_list node? That was going to provide the O(1) bsi_for_stmt
because the stmt annotation pointer was going to be replaced with the
statement_list pointer.

Or did that not completely get off the ground? :-)

Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]