This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] do not lower a/b to a*(1/b)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 12:39:48 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not lower a/b to a*(1/b)
References: <4284D602.9000101@lu.unisi.ch> <200505132050.j4DKod031130@makai.watson.ibm.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505152233510.33827@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <200505152107.j4FL7W010652@makai.watson.ibm.com>

	If the patch that affects -ffast-math has not been tested to
ensure that it does not introduce any new miscompares to SPEC, then it has
not been sufficiently tested for any maintainer to approve the patch.

While I agree in principle, SPEC is non-free, the patch has testcases, and in the worst case there's always the 48-hours rule.

I'm asking on IRC whether somebody can test it for me.

Paolo

References:
- Re: [PATCH] do not lower a/b to a*(1/b)
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] do not lower a/b to a*(1/b)
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] do not lower a/b to a*(1/b)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [PATCH] do not lower a/b to a*(1/b)
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]