Re: [PATCH]: Fix PR tree-optimization/21407

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

On 11/05/2005, at 5:00 PM, Mike Stump wrote:

> On May 11, 2005, at 4:46 PM, Geoff Keating wrote:
>
> > Obviously this statement makes certain limitations, for instance  
> > the C++ standard does not appear to require that an object is  
> > contained in a flat piece of memory (it says "region", not "range"  
> > or "contiguous region"), but this statement does.
>
> I thought it was perfectly clear:
>
> 4 The  object representation of an object of type T is the sequence  
> of N
>   unsigned char objects taken up by the object of type T, where N  
> equals
>   sizeof(T).   The  value representation of an object is the set of  
> bits
>   that hold the value of type T.  For POD types, the  value   
> representa-
>   tion  is  a set of bits in the object representation that  
> determines a
>   value, which is one discrete element of an implementation- 
> defined  set
>   of values.37)
>
> ?

Yes, that's right.  I'd forgotten about that.  (I should have used  
'object representation' in those definitions: "the array made up of  
the object representation of <specify object>".)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature