Re: Patch for bugs 772 and 17913

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

Gábor Lóki wrote:
> > Roger Sayle wrote:
> >
> > > > -  if (TREE_CODE (ifexp) == INTEGER_CST)
> > > > -    return non_lvalue (integer_zerop (ifexp) ? op2 : op1);
> > > > -
> > > >  return fold (build3 (COND_EXPR, result_type, ifexp, op1, op2));
> > > > }

> Well, I did what you asked (remove the prototypes, and so on).
> Bootstraped and regtested without regressions on
> i686-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Is this version OK for commit?

Roger asked me to review this, indicating that he was happy with the 
fold-const.c changes.  I think the c-typeck.c change is fine, as it 
merely defers to fold to do its proper job.  Gabor, please go ahead and 
commit, after waiting 24 hours to allow a C front end maintainer to 
complain about the c-ctypeck.c change.  Or, if a C front end maintainer 
has already said that change is OK, just go ahead and commit.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304