This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, mckinlay at redhat dot com,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:41:19 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
References: <20050417191125.GA29627@lucon.org> <4262B72F.6020400@codesourcery.com> <20050418033125.GA3890@lucon.org> <13fa2234944422c9049b908be63ad375@physics.uc.edu>

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 11:33:13PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> On Apr 17, 2005, at 11:31 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
> >make_local_function_alias is introduced in
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q3/msg00618.html
> >
> >Is there a testcase to show it is really needed? I'd like to run it
> >on ia32, x86_64 and ia64 to verify its usage.
> 
> This was done so that Java code could avoid GOT code.
> 

I am not sure if it makes any differences in GOT on ia32, x86_64 and
ia64. Again, I'd like to see a testcase.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code onia64
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code onia64
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]