This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist
- From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:04:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist
- References: <425ED46F.2070005@wanadoo.fr> <425FE7C2.30506@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <001701c542ae$24feaca0$0400000a@Paul>
Paul Thomas wrote:
>>I still see a number of formatting errors, but I don't think they're
>>reason
>>enough to hold up the patch any further. From my POV this is ok.
>
> Oh, bother! I'll take another run through before submitting tomorrow night.
> Something systematic or random errors of the kind that we have already
> covered? I was going to do a bedrock bootstrap and regtest before
> submitting, so can accept further format corrections or pointers to
> systematic errors.
Mostly "if( adfn" and the like, but I don't remember why I cut my offer to
deal with this after you committed the patch from my e-mail. It's not like
libgfortran is the pinnacle of good formatting anyway, so I don't think I have
too much right to complain. And as I said, to me, it's not a reason to hold
back a patch which adds a much-requested functionality.
- Tobi