This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PR c++/17805] limit operator overload candidates for enum operands
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Apr 2005 01:00:02 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PR c++/17805] limit operator overload candidates for enum operands
- Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
- References: <or3bw4nukq.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><orll963hvi.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><orhdj86bx1.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><ord5td142b.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Apr 2, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 1, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 10, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> We're a bit too lenient in creating the candidate list for overload
>>>> resolution for expressions that use user-defined operator functions.
>>>> This patch arranges for us to reject functions that don't get an exact
>>>> match for at least one of the enum-typed arguments, if none of the
>>>> arguments have class types.
>>>> Regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
>>>> Index: gcc/cp/ChangeLog
>>>> from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
>>>> PR c++/17805
>>>> * call.c (build_new_op): Filter out operator functions that don't
>>>> satisfy enum-conversion match requirements.
>>> Ping?
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00453.html
>> Ping?
> Ping?
Ping?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}