This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410

From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: Nick Rasmussen <nick at ilm dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:57:36 -0700
Subject: Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
References: <20050414012520.GE23361@ewok.lucasdigital.com> <8dfed5c5442ab6f7b8e26d900f57d544@physics.uc.edu> <424c2181a1bce86c11d1aba240eb4479@apple.com>

On Apr 14, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:

On Apr 14, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Does this bug look familiar?  20629 is ICEing in the same spot, but
it looks like theirs was reproducible after preprocessing.  Is there
any more information that I provide that would be helpful?  I've
attached the command line, specs and a stacktrace from cc1plus.
I think this was fixed on the mainline by:
2005-03-18  Dale Johannese  <dalej@apple.com>
* cp/tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle SSA_NAME.
Yep, and I didn't put it in the release branch. Bad Dale. OK to do that?

Checked in following Mark's approval offline. See if that helps.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]