This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH PING]: use more "unlocked" stdio functions

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 11 Apr 2005 13:43:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH PING]: use more "unlocked" stdio functions
References: <200504050238.j352c92F002510@caip.rutgers.edu> <200504111805.j3BI5Zlr021106@caip.rutgers.edu>

"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:

> PING:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00453.html
> 
> Speed improvement of ~1% to ~1.4% at -O0.

Could you break up the extremely long lines so they are less than 80
characters?  (You can use 'dnl' to do this.)

With that change, this is OK.

References:
- [PATCH PR/17092]: use more "unlocked" stdio functions
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- [PATCH PING]: use more "unlocked" stdio functions
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]