This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Committed] PR c++/19199: Preserve COND_EXPR lvalueness in fold
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 05 06:36:15 EDT
- Subject: Re: [Committed] PR c++/19199: Preserve COND_EXPR lvalueness in fold
Of course, untested patches should be clearly marked as such, which
yours always are. Given that, I don't feel like you're wasting my
time with such a posting; if I see something obviously disconcerting I
can comment. However, I do find that I'm less interested in reviewing
such patches. So, from my point of view, I'd prefer that you post
most patches after a full test cycle.
On the other hand, if a patch is potential controvercial and the
testing/debug process would likely take some time, it might be faster
all around to see if anybody has any negative impressions of a patch
at the more conceptual level before commiting that time. However, of course,
such patches should be clearly marked as being posted for that purpose.