This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PowerPC biarch config


For the record...

--- Begin Message ---
On Mar 30, 2005, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

>   Would one of you please review
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01280.html ?

I don't have any problem with it, and it feels to me like all it takes
is approval from a port maintainer, since the configury bits specific
to a port are regarded as falling under the port maintainer's
umbrella.

But if you feel you need an ok from a configury maintainer, you got it
:-)


One concern: the overloading of --enable-targets.  It does serve a
quite similar purpose for binutils, indeed, but I fear that, since the
set of options they accept may differ, one might get in trouble should
it be necessary to pass different flags to bfd's and gcc's
enable-targets.  Sure one can always build them separately, but...

Have you considered something like say powerpc3264-linux, or
powerpc32bi-linux instead?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

--- End Message ---

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]