This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to pass fewer -L multilib arguments
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > This patch was postponed (off-list) to 4.1. I've now tested it still
> > bootstraps with no regressions, on i386-pc-solaris2.10.1. OK to commit?
>
> This patch makes even more sense now that we've agreed that libgcc ought to be
> built and installed using the usual multilib scheme. (This patch actually
> speeds up linking measurably in some cases by substantially reducing the
> number of libraries which are opened, only to find that they have been built
> for the wrong ABI.)
>
> To be slightly conservative, would you try some other OS too?
Committed after testing with no regressions on ia64-hpux (and verifying
that a dynamically linked C++ program could build with both multilibs
using the installed compiler).
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)